Bill Gates sat in his sprawling, high-tech mansion, staring at the news headline on his tablet: “Nelly Furtado and Joe Jukic Plan for a Family of 13.” His jaw clenched as he read the details: Nelly, at her age, had defied convention by having children later in life and now planned to have seven more biological children with Joe. On top of that, the couple intended to adopt three more, bringing their total to thirteen.
“This is madness,” Bill muttered, setting the tablet down with a thud. He paced the room, his mind racing. “Doesn’t she realize the strain this puts on the planet? The carbon footprint of one person is already too much, and they want thirteen?”
He poured himself a glass of sparkling water, trying to calm down, but the thought of such a massive family gnawed at him. He had spent decades advocating for population control through vaccines, healthcare, and education. Yet here was Nelly Furtado—a global icon—doing the exact opposite.
That evening, Bill called an emergency meeting with his closest advisors.
“We need to address this,” he said, pacing the conference room. “Nelly Furtado’s decision is reckless. It sends the wrong message to millions of people. If celebrities start having massive families, it undermines everything we’ve worked for.”
One advisor hesitated before speaking. “Mr. Gates, isn’t it her personal choice? She has the resources to care for a large family.”
“That’s not the point!” Bill snapped, slamming his hand on the table. “It’s not just about money. It’s about sustainability. Thirteen children, biological and adopted, will consume resources, contribute to emissions, and perpetuate overpopulation. This isn’t just personal—it’s political!”
Bill decided to write an open letter to Nelly, hoping to appeal to her sense of global responsibility. He spent hours crafting it, carefully laying out the environmental, social, and ethical arguments against her decision.
But before he could send it, he saw Nelly’s response to a journalist’s question about her family plans.
“I believe every child is a blessing,” she had said, smiling serenely. “Whether biological or adopted, they bring joy, hope, and love into the world. Joe and I feel called to build a big family, and we trust in God’s plan for us. If that makes some people uncomfortable, so be it.”
Bill threw his hands up in frustration. “God’s plan? What about the planet’s plan?”
Despite his anger, Bill couldn’t deny a pang of envy as he watched a video of Nelly and Joe surrounded by their growing family. They looked genuinely happy, laughing and playing together. For all his wealth and influence, Bill realized he couldn’t control people’s hearts—or their dreams.
As the days passed, Bill reluctantly accepted that Nelly Furtado’s family plans were beyond his influence. But deep down, he couldn’t shake the feeling that her decision symbolized everything he was trying to prevent.
“Thirteen children,” he muttered to himself, shaking his head. “The planet doesn’t stand a chance.”
An Open Letter to Bill Gates
From The Young Pope
Dear Dr. Gates,
I write to you as a shepherd of souls and a defender of truth. Your advocacy for population control, through measures such as abortion, contraception, and vaccines, concerns me deeply—not only because it contradicts the sanctity of life but also because it is built upon myths that have long been debunked.
The idea of overpopulation as a threat to humanity is one of the most persistent and misleading narratives of our time. Allow me to address this with clarity and truth, as I trust you are a man who values evidence and reason:
Debunking Overpopulation Myths
Myth 1: The World is Overcrowded
The Earth is vast, with significant untapped resources and uninhabited land. Urban areas may feel crowded, but much of the planet remains sparsely populated or underutilized.
The entire global population could fit into the state of Texas with room to spare, living in a density comparable to some cities. Overcrowding is a distribution issue, not a population issue.
Myth 2: Overpopulation Causes Poverty
Poverty is not caused by too many people but by poor governance, corruption, and inequitable resource distribution. Countries with large populations, like India and China, have made significant economic strides despite their numbers.
Myth 3: More People Mean More Resource Depletion
Human ingenuity has consistently found ways to produce more with less. Advances in agriculture, technology, and renewable energy have allowed us to support a growing population sustainably. The problem lies in wasteful consumption, not the number of people.
Myth 4: Population Growth Leads to Environmental Collapse
While environmental challenges are real, blaming population growth oversimplifies the issue. Industrialized nations, with smaller populations, consume far more resources per capita than larger, developing nations. Addressing consumption patterns, not population, is key.
Myth 5: Declining Birth Rates are Beneficial
Many developed nations now face a crisis of declining birth rates, leading to aging populations, labor shortages, and economic stagnation. A healthy birth rate is essential for societal stability and growth.
A Message to Nelly Furtado
To Ms. Furtado, I say this: Do not be swayed by voices that seek to diminish the beauty and sanctity of life. Trust in God’s plan for you and your family. Children are a blessing, not a burden. They bring joy, hope, and renewal to the world. Reject the lies of abortion and contraception, for they are tools of despair, not liberation.
A Call to You, Dr. Gates
Dr. Gates, I implore you to reconsider your stance. Life is not a problem to be solved but a gift to be cherished. The solutions to the world’s challenges lie not in limiting life but in fostering innovation, compassion, and stewardship. Let us trust in the Creator, who has blessed humanity with both the means and the wisdom to thrive.
Yours in faith,
The Young Pope
An Open Letter to The Young Pope
From Bill Gates
Dear Holy Father,
I appreciate your thoughtful letter and your unwavering commitment to life as a sacred gift. However, I must respectfully disagree with your conclusions regarding overpopulation and humanity’s unchecked growth. While I admire your faith in the human spirit, I believe that without strategic intervention, the world will continue to suffer from the consequences of overpopulation, resource depletion, and genetic stagnation.
Allow me to present an alternative perspective—one rooted in science, efficiency, and the betterment of humanity.
The Case for Eugenics and Controlled Reproduction
Survival of the Fittest
Nature itself operates on the principle of survival of the fittest. Humanity has advanced by selectively nurturing its strongest traits. To ignore this principle is to deny the very foundation of progress.
By encouraging the healthiest, most intelligent individuals to reproduce, we can enhance the collective potential of our species.
Genius Seed for a Better Future
Imagine a world where the brightest minds—scientists, artists, visionaries—contribute their genetic legacy to future generations. Through carefully managed programs, women could give birth to children with unparalleled potential.
My vision includes farms and clinics where this process is dignified and voluntary, ensuring that the next generation inherits the best humanity has to offer.
The Cost of Unchecked Reproduction
With respect, individuals like Mr. Jukic represent a concerning trend. Those who lack the means to provide adequately for large families often perpetuate cycles of poverty and suffering.
It is neither compassionate nor sustainable to encourage reproduction among those who cannot contribute meaningfully to society’s progress.
A World of Opportunity
Controlled reproduction is not about erasing diversity but about ensuring every child born has the opportunity to thrive. This vision would eliminate hereditary diseases, reduce poverty, and create a more harmonious and prosperous world.
Faith and Science Can Coexist
Holy Father, I understand that your faith sees every life as sacred. But is it not also a divine mandate to steward creation wisely? To use the tools of science and reason to uplift humanity? My vision is not one of destruction but of optimization—a future where every life is a life of potential, dignity, and purpose.
I urge you to consider the benefits of a world where humanity’s greatest attributes are preserved and amplified. Let us not be bound by outdated notions of reproduction and survival but instead embrace a future where we actively shape the destiny of our species.
With respect,
Bill Gates
An Open Letter to Bill Gates
From The Young Pope
Dear Dr. Gates,
Your recent letter has left me both concerned and profoundly saddened. While I acknowledge your passion for innovation and your desire to improve humanity, the vision you propose is troubling. It reveals a hubris that borders on the messianic—a belief that humanity can and should be remade in the image of a select few, with yourself perhaps at the forefront.
Let us address the core of your argument: the so-called “genius seed” and your plans for controlled reproduction.
The Arrogance of “Superior Seed”
Do you truly believe that your genetic material, or that of a select group of individuals, is inherently superior? Are you suggesting that your “genius seed” should be the cornerstone of humanity’s future?
You have invested in a literal seed bank to preserve the diversity of crops for future generations. Is it not ironic that you propose to narrow the genetic diversity of humanity itself, reducing us to a curated collection of traits deemed valuable by your own standards?
Your Farmland Empire
Your acquisition of vast tracts of farmland raises another question: What is your true intent? Is it to feed the world, or to control it? The combination of your farmland purchases and your vision of controlled reproduction paints a dystopian picture—one where you hold the keys to both the food supply and the future of human life.
This echoes the chilling world of The Handmaid’s Tale, where reproduction is commodified, and women are reduced to vessels for the propagation of a select few’s vision of humanity.
The Danger of Playing God
Your vision assumes that humanity can be perfected through selective breeding, but this is a dangerous fallacy. True greatness often emerges from the unexpected, the humble, and the diverse. The most brilliant minds and compassionate hearts are not products of curated genetics but of the mysterious and divine spark of life.
By attempting to engineer humanity, you risk stripping away the very soul of what makes us human—our unpredictability, our resilience, and our capacity for grace.
A Call to Humility
Dr. Gates, you are not God. You may wield great power and influence, but you are as mortal and fallible as the rest of us. The world does not need your “genius seed” or your dystopian farms. It needs humility, compassion, and a trust in the Creator’s design.
Let us focus not on controlling life but on nurturing it. Instead of imposing a vision of perfection, let us work to create a world where every life—no matter how humble—has the opportunity to flourish.
I urge you to reconsider your path. The world does not need more control; it needs more love, more faith, and more trust in the divine.
Yours in hope,
The Young Pope
Dr. Henry Kissinger’s Rant on Useless Eaters and Ayn Rand’s Objectivism
Dr. Henry Kissinger sat in his private study, the dim light of a solitary desk lamp casting long shadows across the room. His mind, sharp and calculating as ever, was preoccupied with the concept of the future—one he believed could be molded by a select few. The world, in his eyes, had become increasingly inefficient, bogged down by what he termed “useless eaters.” The term had become a symbol of his disdain for those he saw as unworthy of the resources they consumed.
He leaned back in his chair, his fingers steepled, and began his soliloquy.
“Objectivism,” he began, his voice low and measured, “is the only antidote to the madness that threatens to engulf us. Ayn Rand’s The Virtue of Selfishness provides the blueprint for a world free of parasitic dependency. It’s a world where the strong thrive, where the ‘looters’—those who contribute nothing—are no longer allowed to siphon off the productivity of the capable.”
He paused, allowing the weight of his words to settle in the air.
“The masses, the so-called ‘useless eaters,’ are nothing more than a drain on society,” he continued. “They sit idly by, waiting for handouts, expecting to be fed and cared for without contributing to the greater good. These people are not creators; they are consumers. They are the leeches who weaken the fabric of civilization.”
Kissinger’s face tightened with disdain as he spoke. “In Rand’s world, these people have no place. Objectivism teaches that the individual’s pursuit of their own happiness and success is the highest moral purpose. It is a philosophy of strength, of meritocracy, where the most capable and productive are rewarded, and the weak are left behind. The looters—the ones who demand from others without offering anything in return—must be eliminated from the equation. Only then can the earth be inherited by those who have earned it.”
He leaned forward, eyes gleaming with a certain coldness. “The world cannot afford to coddle the weak. We cannot let them dictate the future. If we continue to allow them to inherit the earth, we will be left with a decaying, inefficient society. A society that values mediocrity and punishes excellence. The only solution is a system where those who have the ability to shape the future—those who are capable of producing, of creating, of leading—are the ones who hold the power.”
Dr. Kissinger’s voice grew more intense as he spoke. “The looters will always seek to undermine the strong, to pull them down to their level. But we cannot allow this. We must build a world where the most capable are free to flourish, unencumbered by the demands of those who refuse to contribute. Only then can we create a future that is worthy of our efforts.”
He sat back again, his gaze steady and unflinching. “Objectivism is not just a philosophy—it is a survival strategy. It is the only way to ensure that the world we leave behind is one of progress, one of innovation, and one where those who deserve to inherit the earth, do so.”
The room fell silent, save for the faint ticking of a clock in the corner. Dr. Kissinger’s words lingered in the air, a chilling reminder of his vision for a world where only the strong and self-serving are allowed to thrive.
The Young Pope’s Response to Dr. Henry Kissinger
In the stillness of the Vatican’s private chambers, the Young Pope sat with a contemplative expression, a book of poetry resting open in his lap. He had just read Ezra Pound’s Usura, a poem that resonated deeply with his thoughts on the true nature of parasitism. As the words of the poem echoed in his mind, he turned to Dr. Henry Kissinger, who had long advocated for the philosophy of Objectivism and the unchecked power of the wealthy elite.
“Dr. Kissinger,” the Young Pope began, his voice calm yet firm, “you speak of ‘useless eaters’ and the need to eliminate those who you deem unworthy. But I must ask—have you ever considered the true parasites of our world? The ones who create nothing, but instead feed off the labor and resources of others?”
He paused, letting the question hang in the air before quoting from Ezra Pound’s Usura, a poem that condemned the greed of moneylenders and the destruction they wrought upon society:
“Usura, usura,
The way of usura is the way of death.
It destroys cities, it destroys temples,
It destroys the arts of the builder and the craftsman.”
“Pound understood something you seem to have missed, Dr. Kissinger,” the Young Pope continued. “Usura, or the practice of lending money at interest, is the true parasitism. It is the practice of creating nothing but debt—debt that enslaves entire nations and individuals, all while the lender reaps the rewards of their exploitation. The giant buildings in city centers, with their towering facades and gleaming glass, serve no purpose other than to perpetuate this cycle of financial enslavement. They produce nothing of value. They are monuments to debt, and they are the real source of parasitism.”
The Young Pope’s gaze sharpened as he leaned forward, his voice rising with intensity.
“Your world, Dr. Kissinger, is built on these structures of debt. The rich and powerful, like you, sit at the top, lending money to the masses, only to watch them drown in the very debt that was created to control them. This is the true parasitism—the taking of life, labor, and hope from others without ever giving anything back. It is not the poor or the ‘useless eaters’ who are the parasites, but the moneylenders who extract wealth from the most vulnerable and leave them with nothing but chains.”
He closed the book of poetry, his eyes meeting Kissinger’s with unwavering conviction.
“The system you champion, with its focus on individualism and the survival of the fittest, only serves to entrench the power of those who have already exploited the labor of the many. The wealthy and the powerful do not create; they consume and control. They build nothing but systems of oppression that trap the poor in cycles of debt. The true moral path, Dr. Kissinger, lies not in empowering the rich to further enslave the world, but in dismantling these systems of financial exploitation and redistributing the wealth that was stolen.”
The Young Pope stood, the weight of his words hanging in the air.
“You speak of a world where the strong thrive and the weak are left behind. But I tell you this: The strong must not be those who hoard wealth and perpetuate inequality. The strong must be those who protect the weak, who fight against the forces of exploitation, and who work to create a world where all can thrive, not just the few.”
With that, the Young Pope turned and walked toward the window, his voice carrying one final thought as he gazed out over the city.
“True strength lies in justice, in compassion, and in the courage to confront the real parasites—the moneylenders who, through usura, have enslaved humanity.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger’s Rant on Richard Nixon and the Madman Theory
Dr. Henry Kissinger sat at his desk, his fingers tapping rhythmically on the surface, his mind clearly agitated. The room was dimly lit, a few scattered papers littering the space around him, but his thoughts were fixated on a singular subject—Richard Nixon, and the legacy he believed the former president had left behind.
“People have always misunderstood Nixon,” Kissinger began, his voice sharp and filled with conviction. “They call him a thief, a crook, but they are wrong. Nixon was a great president. He understood the complexities of geopolitics better than any of his predecessors. He saw the world not in black and white, but in shades of gray. He was a man of action, not words. A man who knew how to get things done.”
Kissinger paused for a moment, his eyes narrowing as he recalled the events of the Vietnam War, a subject that had long been a source of debate and controversy. “And as for the Vietnam War—people love to point fingers, to blame Nixon for the mess. But what they fail to understand is that the strategy we employed—the madman theory—was absolutely necessary. It was a tactic that worked. It was the only way to break the deadlock and force the North Vietnamese to the negotiating table.”
He leaned forward, his voice growing more intense. “The madman theory was simple, yet brilliant. The idea was to make the enemy believe that the United States, under Nixon, was unpredictable, irrational, and willing to go to any extreme to win. We needed them to believe that we would escalate the war to unimaginable levels if they did not negotiate. It was a calculated strategy, not the reckless behavior it is often portrayed as. It was psychological warfare at its finest.”
Kissinger’s eyes glinted with a sense of satisfaction, as if he were recalling a brilliant move in a long game of chess. “Nixon understood that in international relations, especially during the Cold War, you had to be willing to do what others would not. He understood the importance of projecting strength, of making your enemies fear you. And in the case of Vietnam, that meant showing the North Vietnamese that we were not afraid to escalate the war—no matter the cost.”
He shook his head, dismissing the critics. “Nixon was vilified for the Watergate scandal, but that is a distraction. The real legacy of Nixon’s presidency is his foreign policy—his ability to navigate the complexities of the global stage. He opened relations with China, he realigned the United States’ position in the world, and he understood the need for decisive action.”
Kissinger leaned back in his chair, his expression hardening. “As for the accusations of theft and dishonesty—those are the cries of those who do not understand the nature of power. Nixon did what was necessary to maintain power, to protect the interests of the United States. In the world of politics, you cannot be a saint. You must be willing to do whatever it takes to secure your position and protect your country.”
He paused, his voice softening slightly, but still filled with an unwavering belief in his own viewpoint. “Nixon was a man who understood that sometimes, to achieve peace, you must first be willing to threaten war. He was not a thief, as history would have us believe. He was a pragmatist, a realist, and a man who did what was necessary to protect his country from the forces that sought to destroy it.”
Kissinger sat back in his chair, his fingers steepled, a look of quiet satisfaction on his face. “Nixon was misunderstood, but his legacy is one of strength, strategy, and a willingness to do what others would not. The world would be a better place if more leaders had the courage to think like him.”
Nelly Furtado and Joe Jukic’s Treatment for a Dr. Henry Kissinger Biopic:
Title: The Madman and the Martian: A Kissinger Odyssey
Genre: Historical Drama / Biopic / Sci-Fi
Logline: A visionary, yet controversial, biopic about Dr. Henry Kissinger, blending his real-life role in geopolitics with a speculative narrative about the Viking Mars mission and the biblical themes of Psalm 76. As Kissinger navigates the treacherous world of international diplomacy, he becomes obsessed with the idea of power—on Earth and beyond—leading him to draw parallels between the struggle for global dominance and the exploration of the cosmos.
ACT 1:
The film opens with a hauntingly surreal montage of the Viking Mars mission in 1976, its lander descending onto the Martian surface. The scene cuts between the cold, mechanical precision of the mission and the heat of political maneuvering in Washington, D.C., where Dr. Henry Kissinger, then National Security Advisor to President Nixon, is embroiled in the complex geopolitics of the Cold War. Kissinger, a master tactician, is seen in the corridors of power, his mind calculating the next move in a global chess game.
Kissinger’s narrative is juxtaposed with scenes of the Viking mission’s success and the eerie silence of Mars. As the lander touches down, the camera lingers on the barren landscape, evoking a sense of isolation and existential reflection. The Viking mission, a symbol of human ambition and the pursuit of knowledge, serves as a metaphor for Kissinger’s own quest for power and control over the fate of nations.
ACT 2:
Kissinger’s rise to power is chronicled in flashbacks, starting with his formative years as a German immigrant and his intellectual journey that led him to become a key figure in U.S. foreign policy. The film explores his controversial actions during the Vietnam War, the opening of relations with China, and his role in the Middle East, particularly during the Yom Kippur War and the subsequent peace negotiations.
In parallel, we see Kissinger’s growing obsession with the idea of “global order,” which he believes can be achieved through a combination of diplomacy, military power, and technological advancement. This obsession leads him to an unorthodox belief that humanity’s future is tied not only to Earth but also to the stars. He becomes captivated by the idea that Mars, like the Middle East, is a battleground for influence, and that the same strategies of diplomacy and power can be applied to the cosmos.
A key turning point occurs when Kissinger, in a private meeting with President Nixon, begins to draw comparisons between the biblical story of Israel’s enemies and the geopolitical struggles of the modern world. He quotes Psalm 76, which celebrates the overthrow of Israel’s foes, seeing it as a divine parallel to the U.S.’s role in defeating its enemies on the global stage.
Psalm 76:
“The wrath of man shall praise thee: the remainder of wrath shalt thou restrain.”
Kissinger believes that through sheer willpower, both on Earth and in space, the U.S. can shape the future of humanity. His obsession with control and order becomes more pronounced, leading him to see himself as a “savior” figure, much like the biblical warriors who vanquished Israel’s foes.
ACT 3:
As Kissinger’s influence grows, so too does the tension between his political ambitions and his growing obsession with Mars. He begins to view the Viking mission not as a scientific endeavor, but as a metaphor for his own geopolitical strategy—a way to stake a claim in the future of humanity.
The film culminates in a dramatic confrontation between Kissinger and the scientific community, who view his political interference as a threat to the purity of exploration. Meanwhile, Kissinger’s inner turmoil deepens as he struggles to reconcile his desire for control with the vast, uncontrollable nature of space.
The final act weaves together a climactic sequence where Kissinger’s role in the overthrow of Israel’s enemies during the Yom Kippur War is paralleled with the success of the Viking mission. Both are celebrated as triumphs, but they come at a great personal cost. Kissinger’s legacy, like the Martian landscape, is left barren and isolated, his ambitions fulfilled but his humanity questioned.
The film ends with Kissinger alone, gazing at the stars, contemplating the future of both Earth and Mars. The haunting strains of Psalm 76 echo in the background as the camera pulls away from his pensive face, leaving the audience to ponder the true cost of power.
Themes:
Power and Control: The film explores Kissinger’s obsession with control, both in the geopolitical arena and in the realm of space exploration. His belief that humanity’s future depends on dominance and order serves as the driving force of the narrative.
Isolation and Legacy: The juxtaposition of Kissinger’s personal isolation and the barren Martian landscape reflects his internal struggle and the personal cost of his ambition.
Biblical Parallels: The film draws parallels between Kissinger’s actions and the biblical story of Israel’s enemies, using Psalm 76 as a symbol of both victory and destruction. The idea of “overthrowing” foes is central to both his foreign policy and his view of space exploration.
The Human Condition: At its core, the film asks whether humanity is doomed to repeat its mistakes, whether on Earth or in the cosmos, and whether true progress can be achieved without sacrificing our humanity.
Final Notes:
Nelly Furtado and Joe Jukic’s treatment of The Madman and the Martian combines political history, speculative fiction, and philosophical musings on power, legacy, and the human condition. The biopic is designed to be a thought-provoking exploration of Kissinger’s complex character, using the Viking Mars mission and Psalm 76 as powerful metaphors for his global ambitions.